The relationship between the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and the UFC broke down partly due to disagreements over Conor McGregor‘s eligibility to fight earlier and the UFC’s decision not to renew its contract with USADA, most likely due to financial concerns and a desire to have more control over the anti-doping program.
The relationship between the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and the UFC has been strained since this past summer, as reported by CEO Travis Tygart. The rift began when UFC CEO Dana White asserted that there was a definite chance of Conor McGregor returning to fight this year, despite USADA’s claim that McGregor needed to enroll in their anti-doping program for a minimum of six months before competing. White dismissed USADA’s authority, causing tension between the two organizations. Although the UFC never requested an exemption for McGregor, Tygart noted that they were unhappy with USADA’s statements.
Recently, the UFC informed Tygart during a call that they would not renew their contract with the non-profit organization. They mentioned developing their own tailored and cost-effective program. Tygart questioned the sudden concern for costs, considering the UFC’s current valuation of $12 billion. He speculated that the promotion’s new management and financial targets were the driving force behind this decision and suggested that the UFC may hire a firm that falls short of USADA’s standards.
With USADA no longer responsible for Conor McGregor’s testing as of January 1, 2024, Tygart expects the UFC to hire a private company that prioritizes profit over credibility. He predicts that the UFC will handle all aspects of the testing process, from sample collection to result control. However, Tygart emphasized that this model lacks efficacy and transparency compared to USADA’s program.
While USADA faced criticism for its lack of transparency and inconsistent handling of doping cases, many fighters appreciated the random and out-of-competition testing that aimed to clean up the sport. Despite facing resistance from some athletes, the majority approved of USADA’s efforts to protect and support clean athletes. The decision to part ways with USADA does not negate the agency’s work over the past eight years, and they will continue their drug-testing program with the Professional Fighters League.
Tygart made it clear that compromising integrity for financial gain was not an option for USADA. They have always prioritized clean sport and the rights of athletes.